Is it possible that, the freedom described in
Wealth of Nations is not in spite of but because of slavery. [Yes.] Was that kind of wealth possible before? [No.] Is
Wealth of Nations in fact a subtle defense of slavery in the liberal contract tradition as described by
Carole Pateman. What does Carole Pateman say about Adam Smith? Is Adam Smith marveling at the wonders bought as a result of the slave trade?
No comments:
Post a Comment